GIR-GVP Port Capacity Tests
Genesys conducted performance tests of various Genesys Interactive Recording (GIR) and GVP Capacities. This section contains test profiles, test results, and analysis.
xxxx
- GIR-GVP Port Capacity Test Results Summary
- Detailed Studies of GVP Media Server Behavior on Windows
- Detailed Studies of GVP Media Server Behavior on Linux
GVP-GIR Port Capacity Test Profiles
- Software (SW) Profiles Used in These Tests
- Hardware (HW) Profiles Used in These Tests
- Virtual Machine (VM) Profiles Used in These Tests
Software (Profiles Used in 2014 GIR-GVP Port Capacity Tests
| Note: Unless explicitly noted, all MP3 recordings use stereo channels. |
| Software Profile 1 call recording only, MP3 codec (32kbps bit rate) without encryption |
Software Profile 1a call recording only, MP3 codec (16kbps bit rate) without encryption |
Software Profile 1b' call recording only, MP3 codec (8kbps bit rate Mono) without encryption |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Software Profile 2 call recording only, MP3 codec (32kbps) and WAV as dest2 without encryption |
Software Profile 2a call recording only, MP3 codec (16kbps) and WAV as dest2 without encryption |
|---|---|
|
|
| Software Profile 3 call recording only, MP3 codec (32kbps bit rate) with encryption |
Software Profile 3a call recording only, MP3 codec (16kbps bit rate) with encryption |
|---|---|
|
|
| Software Profile 4 call recording only, MP3 codec (32kbps) and WAV as dest2 with encryption |
Software Profile 4a call recording only, MP3 codec (16kbps) and WAV as dest2 with encryption |
|---|---|
|
|
Hardware Profiles Used in 2014 GIR-GVP Port Capacity Tests
| Hardware Profile 1 | Specifications & Recommendations | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Single Hex Core Intel Xeon X5670@ 2.93GHz | |
| Memory | 8 GB or more | 4GB is minimum and 8GB is recommended |
| Network | GigaBit Ethernet | 100MBit supported |
| Storage | 15k rpm SAS HDD disk storage with at least 72GB. RAID 0. |
15k rpm recommended for maximum performance |
| OS | Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Enterprise Edition SP1 |
| Hardware Profile 2 | Specification & Recommendation | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Single Hex Core Intel Xeon X5675@ 3.06GHz | |
| Memory | 16 GB or more | 4GB is minimum for each VM |
| Network | GigaBit Ethernet | 100MBit supported |
| Storage | SSD used for MCP recording cache location. 15k rpm SAS HDD disk storage with at least 136GB used for all other operations. |
SSD and 15k rpm SAS HDD are recommended for maximum performance |
| OS | VM vSphere or ESXi 5.x Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Enterprise Edition SP1 |
VM vSphere 5.x as host OS Windows 2008 Server as Guest OS on VM |
| Hardware Profile 3 | Specification & Recommendation | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Dual Hex Core Xeon X5675 3.06 GHz | |
| Memory | 16GB or more | 8GB is minimum and recommended |
| Network | GigaBit Ethernet | 100MBit supported |
| Storage | 15k rpm SAS HDD disk storage with at least 72GB. RAID 0 |
15k rpm SAS HDD is recommended for maximum performance |
| OS | Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Enterprise Edition SP1 |
| Hardware Profile 4 | Specification & Recommendation | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Dual Hex Core Xeon X5675 3.06 GHz | |
| Memory | 32GB or more | 4GB is minimum for each VM |
| Network | GigaBit Ethernet | 100MBit supported |
| Storage | SSD used for MCP recording cache location. 15k rpm SAS HDD disk storage with at least 360GB used for all other operations. |
SSD and 15k rpm SAS HDD are recommended for maximum performance |
| OS | VM vSphere or ESXi 5.x Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Enterprise Edition SP1 |
VM vSphere 5.x as Host OS Windows 2008 Server as Guest OS on VM |
| Hardware Profile 5 | Specification & Recommendation | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Dual Hex Core Xeon X5675 3.06 GHz | |
| Memory | 32GB or more | 4GB is minimum for each VM |
| Network | GigaBit Ethernet | 100MBit supported |
| Storage | Multiple 15k rpm SAS HDDs disk storage with at least 360GB used for all other operations. RAID 0. |
Split VMs into multiple 15k rpm SAS HDDs. |
| OS | VM vSphere or ESXi 5.x Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Enterprise Edition SP1 |
VM vSphere 5.x as Host OS Windows 2008 Server as Guest OS on VM |
| Hardware Profile 6 | Specification & Recommendation | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Single Eight Core Xeon E5-2640 2.00 GHz | |
| Memory | 64GB or more | 8GB is minimum for each VM |
| Network | GigaBit Ethernet | 100MBit supported |
| Storage | SSD used for MCP logs and recording cache location. 15k rpm SAS HDD disk storage with at least 360GB used for all other operations. RAID 0. | SSD and 15k rpm SAS HDD are recommended for maximum performance. |
| OS | VM vSphere or ESXi 5.x Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Enterprise Edition SP1 |
VM vSphere 5.x as Host OS Windows 2008 Server as Guest OS on VM |
Virtual Machine (VM) Profiles Used in 2014 GIR-GVP Port Capacity Tests
| VM Profile 1 | Specifications & Recommendations | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Host Hardware | Hardware Profile 2 | 1x X5675@3.06GHz 16GB RAM |
| CPU | 2 x vCPU | |
| Memory | 5 GB | 4GB is minimum |
| Network | GigaBit Ethernet | 100MBit supported |
| Storage | 10GB SSD used for MCP recording cache location.36GB 15k rpm SAS HDD disk storage used for all other operations. | SSD is recommended for maximum performance |
| Guest OS | Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Enterprise Edition SP1 |
| VM Profile 2 | Specifications & Recommendations | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Host Hardware | Hardware Profile 4 | 2x X5675@3.06GHz , 32GB RAM |
| CPU | 4 x vCPU | |
| Memory | 8 GB | 4GB is minimum. |
| Network | GigaBit Ethernet | 100MBit supported |
| Storage | 10GB SSD used for MCP recording cache location.At least 36GB 15k rpm SAS HDD disk storage used for all other operations. | SSD is recommended for maximum performance. |
| Guest OS | Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Enterprise Edition SP1 |
| VM Profile 3 | Specifications & Recommendations | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Host Hardware | Hardware Profile 4 | 2x X5675@3.06GHz , 32GB RAM |
| CPU | 3 x vCPU | |
| Memory | 6 GB | 4GB is minimum. |
| Network | GigaBit Ethernet | 100MBit supported |
| Storage | 10GB SSD used for MCP recording cache location.At least 36GB 15k rpm SAS HDD disk storage used for all other operations. | SSD is recommended for maximum performance |
| Guest OS | Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Enterprise Edition SP1 |
| VM Profile 4 | Specifications & Recommendations | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Host Hardware | Hardware Profile 4 | 2x X5675@3.06GHz , 32GB RAM |
| CPU | 2 x vCPU | |
| Memory | 5 GB | 4GB is minimum. |
| Network | GigaBit Ethernet | 100MBit supported |
| Storage | 10GB SSD used for MCP recording cache location.At least 36GB 15k rpm SAS HDD disk storage used for all other operations. | SSD is recommended for maximum performance |
| Guest OS | Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Enterprise Edition SP1 |
| VM Profile 5 | Specifications & Recommendations | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Host Hardware | Hardware Profile 5 | 2x X5675@3.06GHz , 32GB RAM |
| CPU | 2 x vCPU | |
| Memory | 5 GB | 4GB is minimum. |
| Network | GigaBit Ethernet | 100MBit supported |
| Storage | At least 36GB 15k rpm SAS HDD disk storage. | |
| Guest OS | Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Enterprise Edition SP1 |
GIR-GVP Port Capacity Test Results Summary
Criteria
System Port Capacity is the maximum number of ports (Port Density or PD) or rate (Call Arrivals Per Second or CAPS) that a GIR-GVP system can handle; this number must maximize the usage of hardware resources, while maintaining all criteria within the predefined threshold.
Because CPU usage is the usual deciding factor for peak port capacity, this section presents results that correlate to CPU usage (and other criteria such jitter buffer and max delta from sample recordings) to track the quality of recording.
The following criteria are required for an installation to reach the 95th percentile of quality analysis, from a sample RTP stream:
- Packet Loss <= 1%
- Max Jitter Buffer <= 30ms
- Max Delta <= 200ms
Summary of Performance Testing Results
Table 3: GIR-GVP Port Capacity on Physical Servers
| Test Profiles | HW profile | OS | Peak Ports | Comment |
| SW Profile 1 (32 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 1 | Windows 2008 R2 x64 | 200 (preferred) | |
| SW Profile 1 (32 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 1 | Windows 2008 R2 x64 | 220 (peak) | If some of audio quality criteria can be ignored or waived. |
| SW Profile 1a (16 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 1 | Windows 2008 R2 x64 | 240 (preferred) | |
| SW Profile 1a (16 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 1 | Windows 2008 R2 x64 | 270 (peak) | If some of audio quality criteria can be ignored or waived. |
| SW Profile 1a (16 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 6 | Windows 2008 R2 x64 | 350 (preferred) | 8 Dispatchers (= # of cores) |
| SW Profile 1a (16 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 6 | Windows 2008 R2 x64 | 450 (peak) | If some of audio quality criteria can be ignored or waived. 8 Dispatchers (= # of cores) |
| SW Profile 1b (8 Kbps bit rate Mono) | HW Profile 6 | Windows 2008 R2 x64 | 450 (preferred) | 8 Dispatchers (= # of cores) |
| SW Profile 1b Profile 1b (8 Kbps bit rate Mono) | HW Profile 6 | Windows 2008 R2 x64 | 600 (peak) | If some of audio quality criteria can be ignored or waived. 8 Dispatchers (= # of cores) |
| SW Profile 3a (16 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 1 | Windows 2008 R2 x64 | 210 (preferred) | |
| SW Profile 3 (16 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 1 | Windows 2008 R2 x64 | 270 (peak) | If some of audio quality criteria can be ignored or waived. |
| SW Profile 1(32 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 3 | Windows 2008 R2 x64 | 240 (preferred) | |
| SW Profile 1 (32 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 3 | Windows 2008 R2 x64 | 360 (peak) | If some of audio quality criteria can be ignored or waived. |
| SW Profile 1a (16 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 1 | RedHat EL 6.5 x64 | 150 (preferred) | |
| SW Profile 1a (16 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 1 | RedHat EL 6.5 x64 | 210 (peak) | If some of audio quality criteria can be ignored or waived. |
| SW Profile 1a (16 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 6 | RedHat EL 6.6 x64 | 220 (preferred) | |
| SW Profile 1a (16 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 6 | RedHat EL 6.6 x64 | 240 (peak) | If some of audio quality criteria can be ignored or waived. |
| SW Profile 1a (16 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 6 | RedHat EL 6.6 x64 | 300 (preferred) | 8 Dispatchers (= # of cores) |
| SW Profile 1a (16 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 6 | RedHat EL 6.6 x64 | 360 (peak) | If some of audio quality criteria can be ignored or waived. 8 Dispatchers (= # of cores) |
| SW Profile 1b (8 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 6 | RedHat EL 6.6 x64 | 600 (preferred) | 8 Dispatchers (= # of cores) |
| SW Profile 1a (8 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 6 | RedHat EL 6.6 x64 | 650 (peak) | If some of audio quality criteria can be ignored or waived. 8 Dispatchers (= # of cores) |
| SW Profile 2a (16 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 1 | RedHat EL 6.5 x64 | 90 (preferred) | |
| SW Profile 2a (16 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 1 | RedHat EL 6.5 x64 | 150 (peak) | If some of audio quality criteria can be ignored or waived. |
| SW Profile 3a (16 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 1 | RedHat EL 6.5 x64 | 150 (preferred) | |
| SW Profile 3a (16 Kbps bit rate) | HW Profile 1 | RedHat EL 6.5 x64 | 210 (peak) | If some of audio quality criteria can be ignored or waived. |
Table 4: GIR-GVP Port Capacity on Virtual Machines (VMs)
| SW Profile | HW profile | OS | Port Capacity | Comment |
| SW Profile 1 (32 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 1 | VM vSphere 5.1 Windows 2008 R2 x64 |
300 (preferred) | 3 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 1 (32 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 1 | VM vSphere 5.1 Windows 2008 R2 x64 |
360 (peak) | 3 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 1 (32 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 2 | VM vSphere 5.1 Windows 2008 R2 x64 |
360 (preferred) | 3 VMs: each VM uses 4 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 1 (32 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 2 | VM vSphere 5.1 Windows 2008 R2 x64 |
390 (peak) | 3 VMs: each VM uses 4 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 1 (32 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 3 | VM vSphere 5.1 Windows 2008 R2 x64 |
520 (preferred) | 4 VMs: each VM uses 3 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 1 (32 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 3 | VM vSphere 5.1 Windows 2008 R2 x64 |
600 (peak) | 4 VMs: each VM uses 3 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 1 (32 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 4 | VM vSphere 5.1 Windows 2008 R2 x64 |
600 (preferred) | 6 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 1 (32 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 4 | VM vSphere 5.1 Windows 2008 R2 x64 |
660 (peak) | 6 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 1a (16 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 4 | VM vSphere 5.5 Windows 2008 R2 x64 |
720 (peak) | 6 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 1a (32 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 4 | VM vSphere 5.5 Windows 2008 R2 x64 |
840 (peak) | 6 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 2 (32 Kbps bit rate MP3 + WAV) | VM Profile 4 | VM vSphere 5.1 Windows 2008 R2 x64 |
360 (preferred) | 6 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 2 (32 Kbps bit rate MP3 + WAV) | VM Profile 4 | VM vSphere 5.1 Windows 2008 R2 x64 |
540 (peak) | 6 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 3a (16 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 4 | VM vSphere 5.5/ Windows 2008 R2 x64 | 480 (preferred) | 6 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 3a (16 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 4 | VM vSphere 5.5/ Windows 2008 R2 x64 | 840 (peak) | 6 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 1a (16 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 4 | VM vSphere 5.5/ RH EL 6.5 x64 | 540 (preferred) | 6 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 1a (16 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 4 | VM vSphere 5.5/ RH EL 6.5 x64 | 660 (peak) | 6 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 2a (16 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 4 | VM vSphere 5.5/ RH EL 6.5 x64 | 480 (preferred) | 6 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 2a (16 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 4 | VM vSphere 5.5/ RH EL 6.5 x64 | 600 (peak) | 6 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 3a (16 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 4 | VM vSphere 5.5/ RH EL 6.5 x64 | 540 (preferred) | 6 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 3a (16 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 4 | VM vSphere 5.5/ RH EL 6.5 x64 | 660 (peak) | 6 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 4a (16 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 4 | VM vSphere 5.5/ RH EL 6.5 x64 | 480 (preferred) | 6 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
| SW Profile 4a (16 Kbps bit rate) | VM Profile 4 | VM vSphere 5.5/ RH EL 6.5 x64 | 600 (peak) | 6 VMs: each VM uses 2 vCPU & 1 MCP installed per VM. |
Parameter Adjustments
These adjustments achieve higher port capacity:
Parameter Value Adjustments Yielding Higher Port Capacity
| Parameter | Default Value | Adjusted Value |
|---|---|---|
| mpc.recordnumparallelpost | 30 | 300 |
| mpc.recordpostretrybackoff | 120000 | 15000 |
| mpc.recordpostretrycount | 3 | 1 |
| mpc.mediamgr.recordwritetimeinterval | 1000 | 10000 |
| fm.http_proxy | <not empty> | <empty> (squid bypassed) |
Detailed Studies of GVP Media Server Behavior on Windows
- Performance Comparison of Physical Server and Virtual Machines
- Performance Comparison of Different Virtual Machines Configurations
- Performance Comparison of MP3 only and MP3 + WAV
- Performance Comparison between SAS HDDs and SSD
- Data Throughput
- MCP IOPS
- MP3 16 kbps Bit Rate
- MP3 16 kbps Bit Rate with Encryption
Performance Comparison of Physical Server and Virtual Machines
Single Hex Core
With a single hex core CPU, Genesys recommends 200 ports as a reasonable peak port capacity on a physical server with a single X5670, assuming that all criteria have been met. 300 ports can be achieved with a three-VMs configuration of the same hardware, with a single X5675 (performance is slightly better than X5670). The graph below compares overall CPU usage:
Memory usage for MCP scales linearly against port capacity:
The two graphs below compare the 95th percentile value of Max Jitter Buffer and Max Delta, tracking audio quality from a sample RTP stream:
A strong correlation exists between Max Jitter Buffer and Max Delta, regarding audio quality. A physical server can meet all criteria when its port capacity is 200 or below. Port capacity that is between 200 and 220 may impact audio quality, since both Max Jitter buffer and Max Delta are just slightly beyond the passing criteria. You can consider 220 as peak performance, if audio quality is not strictly required and can be waived. However, when port capacity reaches 230 or beyond, the two values become so big that there is apparent audio quality impact.
For VM configuration: Preferred/Recommended = 300 ports; Peak Port Capacity = 360 ports. With 390 ports, overall system CPU usage is 97%, close enough to 100% that it also observed audio quality impact.
Below are two tables of IOPS for the above two configurations:
Table 1: Disk IOPS of system level from a physical server with a single hex core
| Ports | Disk IOPS Physical Server | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 60 | 11.13 | 0.001 | 11.13 |
| 120 | 21.82 | 0.001 | 21.82 |
| 180 | 32.03 | 0.001 | 32.03 |
| 200 | 34.95 | 0.001 | 34.95 |
| 210 | 36.53 | 0.001 | 36.53 |
| 220 | 37.76 | 0.001 | 37.76 |
| 230 | 39.48 | 0.001 | 39.48 |
| 240 | 43.33 | 0.002 | 43.33 |
Table 2: Disk IOPS of sum of all VMs of single hex core
| Ports | Disk IOPS VMs Overall | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 20.68 | 0.101 | 20.58 |
| 240 | 36.29 | 0.070 | 36.22 |
| 270 | 41.39 | 0.087 | 41.30 |
| 300 | 45.57 | 0.065 | 45.50 |
| 330 | 48.85 | 0.000 | 48.85 |
| 360 | 51.69 | 0.000 | 51.69 |
| 390 | 57.82 | 0.002 | 57.82 |
Disk IOPS in Disk IOPS of sum of all VMs of single hex core table is the sum of Disk IOPS from all VMs. Also, IOPS is measured from each VM and then totaled, to determine overall IOPS. The same method is applied to all Disk IO calculations for VM environments in this series of tests.
Also in the above two tables, the IOPS Reads value is quite small because most of the operations are Writes.
The graph below compares the two IOPS tables above:
- System level disk IOPS is scaling linearly against port capacity for both physical server and virtual machines.
- SSD is only used on VM env as cache folder of MCP recording while SAS HDD drive is used to installed OS and MCP.
Dual Hex Cores
With a host of dual hex core CPUs (2x X5675@3.06GHz) with 32 GB RAM, we also compare the results from physical server and VM env. In VM env, on same hardware spec, 3 VMs are configured with 4 vCPU and 8 GB RAM assigned to each VM. Only one MCP installed on each VM and a SSD partition is used as cache folder for MCP recording.
The graph below depicts the overall system CPU usage:
The next two graphs show 95 percentile values of Max Jitter and Max Delta from sample RTP stream quality analysis:
The two tables below show:
- Disk IOPS at system level on a physical server.
and - Disk IOPS at system level on a VM environment.
Table 3: Disk IOPS at system level from physical server of dual hex cores
| Ports | Disk IOPS Physical Server | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 50 | 9.069 | 0.000 | 9.07 |
| 100 | 18.587 | 0.000 | 18.59 |
| 150 | 28.598 | 0.001 | 28.60 |
| 200 | 37.460 | 0.001 | 37.46 |
| 240 | 41.290 | 0.003 | 41.29 |
| 280 | 49.031 | 0.020 | 49.01 |
| 330 | 53.373 | 0.001 | 53.37 |
| 350 | 53.150 | 0.001 | 53.15 |
| 380 | 61.456 | 0.001 | 61.46 |
| 400 | 64.123 | 0.001 | 64.12 |
Table 4: Disk IOPS of sum of all 3 VMs of dual hex cores
| Ports | Overall Disk IOPS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 22.38 | 0.024 | 22.35 |
| 240 | 38.99 | 0.012 | 38.97 |
| 300 | 48.60 | 0.017 | 48.59 |
| 360 | 56.05 | 0.047 | 56.00 |
| 390 | 60.24 | 0.002 | 60.24 |
| 420 | 64.59 | 0.028 | 64.57 |
The graph below compares the above two tables above:
- Comparing the figure Comparison of System Disk IOPS Physical Server and VM from Single Hex Core and Comparison of System Disk IOPS Physical Server and VM from Dual Hex Cores: IOPS is linearly related to ports. No big differences exist between the physical server and the VM environment.
- SSD is used only in VM environments, as the cache folder of MCP recordings, while an SAS HDD drive is used to install the OS and MCP.
Performance Comparison of Different Virtual Machines Configurations
Overall CPU usage on a physical server beyond peak port capacity is actually higher than overall CPU usage on virtual machines, while audio quality actually shows a quick downfall on a physical server. So the splitting the load into multiple MCPs in a VM environment will definitely take advantage of hardware resources and will achieve high port capacity with fewer audio quality concerns. There are three different VM configurations on the same hardware spec (counting the dual hex cores, 12 vCPUs in total) that are used for this purpose:
- 3 VMs in total, 4 vCPU are assigned to each VM, only one MCP installed on one VM.
- 4 VMs in total, 3 vCPU are assigned to each VM, only one MCP installed on one VM.
- 6 VMs in total, 2 vCPU are assigned to each VM, only one MCP installed on one VM.
The graph below compares overall system CPU usage.
Overall CPU usage scales linearly against port capacity, regardless of how many VMs are configured.
The two graphs below compare RTP stream quality related Max Jitter and Max Delta on these three different VM configurations:
To achieve higher port capacity, configure more VMs and assign less vCPU to each VM. With audio quality criteria considered, Genesys recommends 600 ports as peak for six VM configurations. Six VMs with two vCPUs for each VM is the optimal configuration.
Below is the table of IOPS for 6 VM configurations:
Table: Disk IOPS of sum of all 6 VMs of dual hex cores, MP3 only
| Ports | Overall Disk IOPS (kbps) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 25.18 | 0.028 | 25.15 |
| 240 | 42.75 | 0.052 | 42.70 |
| 300 | 51.16 | 0.004 | 51.15 |
| 360 | 59.61 | 0.000 | 59.61 |
| 420 | 67.04 | 0.000 | 67.04 |
| 480 | 74.82 | 0.000 | 74.82 |
| 540 | 86.30 | 0.000 | 86.30 |
| 600 | 94.11 | 0.000 | 94.11 |
| 660 | 102.05 | 0.000 | 102.04 |
| 720 | 111.30 | 0.000 | 111.29 |
The graph below compares the two tables of IOPS (Table: Disk IOPS of sum of all 3 VMs of dual hex cores for 3 VMs and Table: Disk IOPS of sum of all 6 VMs of dual hex cores, MP3 only for 6 VMs), on the same hardware spec of dual hex cores:
- System Disk IOPS scales linearly against port capacity, but not related for VM configurations.
- We ran an additional test with only 1 vCPU assigned to each VM, on a single hex core server Hardware profile 2, with a 6-VMs in total on the one server. We could barely run beyond 150 ports—the single CPU cannot be linearly scaled—which compares with a 3-VMs configuration:
The two graphs below show that both Max Jitter and Max Delta jump significantly beyond 150 ports:
The comparison indicates that MCP doesn’t perform well on a single vCPU VM.
Performance Comparison of MP3 only and MP3 + WAV
The graph below compares two test profiles (Profile 1 of MP3 only and Profile 2 of MP3 + WAV as dest2) on the same hardware spec with same 6 VM configurations of 2 vCPU per VM. Below is the CPU usage:
Overall CPU usage for Software Profile 2 (MP3 + WAV) is slightly higher than for Software Profile 1 (MP3 only).
The two graphs below compare audio quality criteria:
- For this test, applying Profile 2 to a 6 VMs configuration: Preferred/Recommended = 360 ports; Peak Port Capacity = 530 ports, if you can ignore some potential impact to audio quality.
The table below shows the IOPS of the sum of all 6 VMs for a test profile of MP3 + wav:
Table: IOPS of sum of all 6 VMs of dual hex cores, MP3 + wav
| Ports | Overall Disk IOPS (kbps) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 42.64 | 0.01 | 42.63 |
| 240 | 77.69 | 0.00 | 77.69 |
| 300 | 95.99 | 0.00 | 95.99 |
| 360 | 114.28 | 0.00 | 114.28 |
| 420 | 130.45 | 0.00 | 130.45 |
| 480 | 149.58 | 0.00 | 149.58 |
| 540 | 172.49 | 0.00 | 172.49 |
| 600 | 194.55 | 0.00 | 194.55 |
| 660 | 177.80 | 0.00 | 177.80 |
The graph below compares Table: IOPS of sum of all 6 VMs of dual hex cores, MP3 + wav with Table: Disk IOPS of sum of all 6 VMs of dual hex cores, MP3 only:
As we have cache folder on a different SSD drive, we can break down disk IOPS for each drive as below:
Table: Disk IOPS Break Down per Drive, Test Profile 1, MP3 only
| Ports | Overall Disk IOPS (kbps) | SSD Drive E Disk IOPS (kbps) | HDD Drive C Disk IOPS (kbps) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | Total | Reads | Writes | Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 25.18 | 0.03 | 25.15 | 20.88 | 0.00 | 20.88 | 4.30 | 0.03 | 4.28 |
| 240 | 42.75 | 0.05 | 42.70 | 36.96 | 0.00 | 36.96 | 5.79 | 0.05 | 5.74 |
| 300 | 51.16 | 0.00 | 51.15 | 44.63 | 0.00 | 44.63 | 6.53 | 0.00 | 6.53 |
| 360 | 59.61 | 0.00 | 59.61 | 52.80 | 0.00 | 52.80 | 6.81 | 0.00 | 6.81 |
| 420 | 67.04 | 0.00 | 67.04 | 60.31 | 0.00 | 60.31 | 6.74 | 0.00 | 6.74 |
| 480 | 74.82 | 0.00 | 74.82 | 67.85 | 0.00 | 67.85 | 6.97 | 0.00 | 6.97 |
| 540 | 86.30 | 0.00 | 86.30 | 79.31 | 0.00 | 79.31 | 6.99 | 0.00 | 6.99 |
| 600 | 94.11 | 0.00 | 94.11 | 87.31 | 0.00 | 87.31 | 6.80 | 0.00 | 6.80 |
| 660 | 102.05 | 0.00 | 102.04 | 95.12 | 0.00 | 95.12 | 6.92 | 0.00 | 6.92 |
| 720 | 111.30 | 0.00 | 111.29 | 104.30 | 0.00 | 104.30 | 6.99 | 0.00 | 6.99 |
Table: Disk IOPS Break Down per Drive, Test Profile 2, MP3 + wav
| Ports | Overall Disk IOPS (kbps) | SSD Drive E Disk IOPS (kbps) | HDD Drive C Disk IOPS (kbps) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | Total | Reads | Writes | Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 42.64 | 0.01 | 42.63 | 38.38 | 0.00 | 38.38 | 4.26 | 0.01 | 4.26 |
| 240 | 77.69 | 0.00 | 77.69 | 72.07 | 0.00 | 72.07 | 5.62 | 0.00 | 5.62 |
| 300 | 95.99 | 0.00 | 95.99 | 89.04 | 0.00 | 89.04 | 6.95 | 0.00 | 6.95 |
| 360 | 114.28 | 0.00 | 114.28 | 107.50 | 0.00 | 107.50 | 6.78 | 0.00 | 6.78 |
| 420 | 130.45 | 0.00 | 130.45 | 123.56 | 0.00 | 123.56 | 6.89 | 0.00 | 6.89 |
| 480 | 149.58 | 0.00 | 149.58 | 142.65 | 0.00 | 142.65 | 6.92 | 0.00 | 6.92 |
| 540 | 172.49 | 0.00 | 172.49 | 165.61 | 0.00 | 165.61 | 6.88 | 0.00 | 6.88 |
| 600 | 194.55 | 0.00 | 194.55 | 187.53 | 0.00 | 187.53 | 7.02 | 0.00 | 7.02 |
The two graphs below compare corresponding drives:
This SSD drive is used exclusively as the cache folder for MCP recording. The IOPS for Profile 2 (two dest2, MP3 + wav) is as double as Profile 1 (one dest. MP3 only).
This HDD drive is used for all operations except the cache folder for MCP recording. IOPS is nearly constant at a regular load and below peak. Thus, the IOPS estimating formula can be:
IOPS1 = C + k * P (dest only)
IOPS2 = C + 2k * P (both dest + dest2)
Where P = ports, C = 7, k = 0.15
Performance Comparison between SAS HDDs and SSD
These tests compare performance between SAS HDDs and SSD for recording, using 6 VMs from the same hardware spec, and these four different HDD and SSD combinations:
- 1 HDD: all 6 VMs on one 15 krpm SAS HDD drive.
- 2 HDD: split 6 VMs on two 15 krpm SAS HDD drives, 3 VMs per drive.
- 3 HDD: split 6 VMs on three 15 krpm SAS HDD drives, 2 VMs per drive.
- SSD: all 6 VMs on one 15 krpm SAS HDD while a separate SSD drive used as cache folder only.
The testing was executed with Profile 1, MP3 only. Below is the overall system CPU usage:
The overall system CPU usage exhibits no significant different between HDD and SDD.
IOPS is almost the same for these 4 combinations, so these tests use the numbers in Table: Disk IOPS of sum of all 6 VMs of dual hex cores, MP3 only.
The graphs below compare max jitter and max delta for HDD/SSD drive combinations:
This graph illustrates the average disk write queue for one drive:
- The queue starts to increase non linearly around 360 ports, which makes that number close to maximum port capacity of the hard drive.
- In the three graphs above: with only one HDD drive, both max jitter and max delta started to increase dramatically from 330 ports and higher. Thus: Preferable/Recommended = 330 ports; Peak Port Capacity = 360 ports. In Table: Disk IOPS of sum of all 6 VMs of dual hex cores, MP3 only, IOPS is 51 for 330 ports; while IOPS is around 60 for 360 ports. Thus: Preferable/Recommended IOPS = 51; maximum IOPS for one 15 krpm SAS HDD = 60.
- With multiple HDDs (2 or 3) to split the load, peak port capacity is nearly the same as SSD—660 ports since the load per drive would be 330 (for 2 HDD drives) and 220 (for 3 HDD drives). Max jitter does not exhibit big differences for these three configurations. But max delta shows a higher delay for 3 HDDs compared to SSD, and 2 HDDs compared to 3 HDDs. Thus: with strict audio quality required in these scenarios, fast media such as SSD will help improve latency and minimize any potential audio quality issues.
Data Throughput
These two formulas estimate data throughputs:
Formula 1 (for MP3 only):
MP3 bitrate * Ports / 8 = KB/sec
Or 32kbps * Ports / 8 =KB/sec if MP3 is 32kbps
Formula 2 (for MP3 + wav):
(MP3 bitrate + WAV bitrate) * Ports / 8 = KB/sec
Or (32 kbps + 128 kpbs) * Ports / 8 = 160 kbps / 8 = KB/sec if 32kpbs MP3 + wav
Six VM configurations, with SSD as the cache folder for MCP recording, produced the following measurements from testing for test SW Profile 1 (MP3 32 kbps only):
Table: Data Throughputs for MP3 32 kbps only
| Ports | Overall Disk (kbps) | SSD Drive Disk (kbps) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 554.10 | 0.12 | 553.98 | 536.98 | 0.00 | 536.98 |
| 240 | 1075.70 | 0.50 | 1075.19 | 1053.19 | 0.00 | 1053.19 |
| 300 | 1332.61 | 0.06 | 1332.55 | 1308.69 | 0.00 | 1308.69 |
| 360 | 1601.09 | 0.00 | 1601.09 | 1575.02 | 0.00 | 1575.02 |
| 420 | 1847.91 | 0.00 | 1847.91 | 1822.30 | 0.00 | 1822.30 |
| 480 | 2109.57 | 0.00 | 2109.57 | 2082.49 | 0.00 | 2082.49 |
| 540 | 2461.25 | 0.00 | 2461.25 | 2434.04 | 0.00 | 2434.04 |
| 600 | 2728.83 | 0.00 | 2728.83 | 2702.57 | 0.00 | 2702.57 |
| 660 | 3010.07 | 0.00 | 3010.07 | 2982.84 | 0.00 | 2982.84 |
| 720 | 3310.64 | 0.00 | 3310.64 | 3280.45 | 0.00 | 3280.45 |
Apply Formula 1 to the 120-port and 600-port samples from the table above to achieve these results:
32 kpbs * 120 / 8 = 480 kb close to 534 in the table (in SSD)
32 kpbs * 600 / 8 = 2400 kb close to 2703 in the table (in SSD)
The measurements from real testing are slightly higher than calculations. Because other files such as metadata and JSON files are saved in the same cache folder, the formula might need adjusting.
Below is the table from testing measurement for SW Profile 2 (MP3 + wav) on the same 6 VM configuration with SSD as cache folder of MCP recording:
Table: Data Throughputs for MP3 32 kbps + wav
| Ports | Overall Disk (kbps) | SSD Drive Disk (kbps) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 2444.255 | 0.25 | 2444.01 | 2427.025 | 0.000 | 2427.025 |
| 240 | 4881.163 | 0.01 | 4881.15 | 4859.951 | 0.000 | 4859.951 |
| 300 | 6083.649 | 0.00 | 6083.64 | 6058.294 | 0.000 | 6058.294 |
| 360 | 7380.491 | 0.00 | 7380.49 | 7354.970 | 0.000 | 7354.970 |
| 420 | 8547.663 | 0.00 | 8547.66 | 8522.034 | 0.000 | 8522.034 |
| 480 | 9828.785 | 0.00 | 9828.79 | 9802.991 | 0.000 | 9802.991 |
| 540 | 11093.931 | 0.00 | 11093.93 | 11067.838 | 0.000 | 11067.838 |
| 600 | 12335.993 | 0.01 | 12335.99 | 12309.182 | 0.000 | 12309.182 |
Apply Formula 2 to the 120-port and 600-port samples in the table above to achieve these results:
(32 kbps + 128 kbps) * 120 / 8 = 2400 kb close to 2427 in the table
(32 kbps + 128 kbps) * 600 / 8 = 12000 kb close to 12309 in the table
MCP IOPS
A single HDD local hard drive was used for testing because the HDD itself could become the bottleneck. These tests focus on disk IOPS measurement and calculation, and certain real deployment scenarios require that a local drive not be used. Thus, the measurement for MCP IOPS is useful to calculate overall IO requirement. The three tables below offer three typical MCP IOPS configurations:
Table: MCP IOPS on physical server of single hex core, MP3 only
| Ports | Physical MCP IOPS (kbps) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Read | Write | |
| 60 | 21.88 | 14.93 | 6.95 |
| 120 | 43.25 | 29.64 | 13.60 |
| 180 | 63.28 | 43.37 | 19.91 |
| 200 | 71.47 | 49.35 | 22.12 |
| 210 | 74.95 | 51.58 | 23.37 |
| 220 | 78.40 | 53.93 | 24.47 |
| 230 | 82.51 | 56.83 | 25.68 |
| 240 | 85.28 | 58.37 | 26.90 |
Table: MCP IOPS on 6 VMs of dual hex core, MP3 only
| MP3 only Ports |
Overall 6 VM MCP IOPS (kbps) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Read | Write | |
| 120 | 43.672 | 29.679 | 13.993 |
| 240 | 87.477 | 59.280 | 28.197 |
| 300 | 109.292 | 73.848 | 35.445 |
| 360 | 130.965 | 88.917 | 42.047 |
| 420 | 151.706 | 103.095 | 48.611 |
| 480 | 171.290 | 116.053 | 55.237 |
| 540 | 194.772 | 132.867 | 61.905 |
| 600 | 215.101 | 146.882 | 68.219 |
| 660 | 236.654 | 161.990 | 74.664 |
| 720 | 259.100 | 177.279 | 81.820 |
Table: MCP IOPS on 6 VMs of dual hex core, MP3 + wav
| MP3 + wav Ports |
Overall 6 VM MCP IOPS (kbps) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Read | Write | |
| 120 | 173.607 | 146.092 | 27.515 |
| 240 | 348.369 | 292.884 | 55.486 |
| 300 | 434.511 | 364.898 | 69.613 |
| 360 | 522.447 | 439.412 | 83.035 |
| 420 | 600.880 | 504.682 | 96.198 |
| 480 | 693.861 | 583.965 | 109.896 |
| 540 | 780.187 | 656.958 | 123.229 |
| 600 | 859.359 | 722.907 | 136.453 |
| 660 | 790.737 | 664.024 | 126.713 |
The graph below compares the two tables MCP IOPS on physical server of single hex core, MP3 only and MCP IOPS on 6 VMs of dual hex core, MP3 only:
The graph below compares the two tables MCP IOPS on 6 VMs of dual hex core, MP3 only and MCP IOPS on 6 VMs of dual hex core, MP3 + wav:
The MCP IOPS is related to the test profile and ports, but on the same physical server and VMs.
MP3 16KBPS Bit Rate Compression
Support for MP3 16 kbps bit rate recording compression began with The GVP 8.5.1 release in December 2014. We tested performance on physical server and Virtual Machine (VM) environments, using Windows 2008 R2 x64.
Physical Server on Single Hex Core
Testing was performed on Hardware Profile 1: a physical server on a single hex core of Dell R410. The three graphs below compare system CPU usage and audio quality related metrics, max jitter and max delta.
MP3 16kbps consumes less CPU memory, which means higher port capacity. The two graphs above that compare Max Jitter with Max Delta also indicate the higher port capacity of MP3 16kbps. Recommended port capacity for MP3 16kbps: 240 ports (20% higher than the 200 recommended port capacity for MP3 32kbps). Peak port capacity: 270 ports (22.7% higher than the 220 peak port capacity for MP3 32kbps).
The table below lists the system disk IOPS:
Figure 45: System Disk IOPS on Physical Server, MP3 only 16 Kbps
| Ports | Physical Server Disk IOPS (kbps) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 60 | 14.66 | 0.036 | 14.62 |
| 120 | 24.00 | 0.041 | 23.95 |
| 180 | 33.42 | 0.029 | 33.39 |
| 210 | 37.65 | 0.030 | 37.62 |
| 240 | 42.21 | 0.029 | 42.18 |
| 270 | 47.18 | 0.036 | 47.14 |
| 300 | 51.44 | 0.011 | 51.43 |
| 330 | 55.81 | 0.006 | 55.81 |
| 360 | 60.99 | 0.002 | 60.99 |
| 390 | 67.12 | 0.003 | 67.11 |
The graph below compares Table: System Disk IOPS on Physical Server, MP3 only 16 Kbps with Table: Disk IOPS of system level from a physical server with a single hex core, both on a single hex core server:
The system disk IOPS for MP3 16kbps and 32kbps are nearly identical to each other; reasonable since the disk IO operations should be the same, and at the same port capacity, no matter which MP3 bit rate is chosen.
MCP IOPS is listed here:
Figure 47: MCP IOPS on physical server of single hex core, MP3 only, 16 Kbps
| Ports | Physical Server MCP IOPS (kbps) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 60 | 14.56 | 7.53 | 7.04 |
| 120 | 28.64 | 14.92 | 13.72 |
| 180 | 42.54 | 22.29 | 20.25 |
| 210 | 49.42 | 25.93 | 23.48 |
| 240 | 56.41 | 29.64 | 26.76 |
| 270 | 63.38 | 33.34 | 30.04 |
| 300 | 70.36 | 36.92 | 33.44 |
| 330 | 77.53 | 40.79 | 36.74 |
| 360 | 85.52 | 44.46 | 41.06 |
| 390 | 94.68 | 48.14 | 46.54 |
The graph below compares Table: MCP IOPS on physical server of single hex core, MP3 only, 16 Kbps and Table: MCP IOPS on physical server of single hex core, MP3 only:
MP3 16kbps uses less IOPS at the process level, probably be due to fewer network operations for MP3 16kbps.
VMs on Dual Hex Cores Server
The testing for MP3 16kbps was conducted on VM Profile 4 (based on Hardware Profile 4, which is a dual hex cores server). 6 VMs were configured, while only one MCP was installed on each Windows VM. The three graphs below compare overall CPU usage, audio quality related max jitter and max delta for MP3 16kbps vs 32kbps:
MP3 16kbps consumes less CPU memory, which matches test results on a physical server in Figure: Comparison of System CPU Usage, MP3 16kbps vs 32kbps on Physical Server. Both Max Jitter and Max Delta also show a higher port capacity for MP3 16kbps compression, which also matches test results on a physical server from Figure 4: Comparison of Max Jitter, MP3 16kbps vs 32kbps on Physical Server & Figure: Comparison of Max Delta MP3 16kbps vs 32kbps on a Physical Server. Preferred/Recommended port capacity for MP3 16 kbps: 720 ports (20% higher 600 ports for than MP3 32kbps). It’s the same increase as observed from a physical server. Peak port capacity for MP3 16kpbs can be as high as 840 ports (27.3% higher than 660 peak port capacity for MP3 32kbps.
The table below illustrates system disk IOPS:
Figure 52: Overall Disk IOPS on all 6 VMs of dual hex cores, MP3 only, 16 Kbps
| Ports | Overall 6 VMs Disk IOPS (kbps) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 26.57 | 0.13 | 26.44 |
| 360 | 63.47 | 0.13 | 63.34 |
| 480 | 80.66 | 0.15 | 80.51 |
| 600 | 93.73 | 0.04 | 93.69 |
| 660 | 109.53 | 0.14 | 109.39 |
| 720 | 118.76 | 0.13 | 118.62 |
| 780 | 126.15 | 0.07 | 126.08 |
| 840 | 134.12 | 0.04 | 134.09 |
| 900 | 142.21 | 0.09 | 142.12 |
The graph below compares overall disk IOPS of all 6 VMs for MP3 16kpbs against 32kbps in Table: Disk IOPS of sum of all 6 VMs of dual hex cores, MP3 only':
The IOPS from both MP3 16kbps and 32kbps are inline with each other, as in the physical server tests.
Data throughput for MP3 16kbps is listed in following table:
Figure 54: Data Throughputs for MP3 only, 16 kbps
| Ports | Overall Disk (kbps) | SSD Drive Disk (kbps) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 318.17 | 0.68 | 317.49 | 296.313 | 0.001 | 296.312 |
| 360 | 892.94 | 0.52 | 892.42 | 856.077 | 0.001 | 856.076 |
| 480 | 1175.63 | 0.79 | 1174.84 | 1132.997 | 0.001 | 1132.996 |
| 600 | 1537.43 | 0.19 | 1537.23 | 1510.543 | 0.000 | 1510.543 |
| 660 | 1729.45 | 0.58 | 1728.87 | 1680.374 | 0.003 | 1680.371 |
| 720 | 1890.48 | 0.58 | 1889.90 | 1837.492 | 0.000 | 1837.492 |
| 780 | 2045.34 | 0.35 | 2045.00 | 1995.239 | 0.004 | 1995.235 |
| 840 | 2191.98 | 0.15 | 2191.83 | 2142.373 | 0.002 | 2142.371 |
| 900 | 2349.18 | 0.75 | 2348.44 | 2298.426 | 0.004 | 2298.422 |
Using this formula:
MP3 bitrate * Ports / 8 = kbps
...where MP3 bitrate=16kbps and Ports = 120 and 720 from the table above,
The results...
16 kpbs * 120 / 8 = 240 kbps (compared to 296 in the table -- in SSD)
and
16 kpbs * 720 / 8 = 14400 kbps (compared to 1837 in the table -- in SSD)
...from real testing for MP3 16kbps are slightly higher than calculations predict, due to other files such as metadata and JSON files being saved in the same cache folder. So the formula still stands.
The following table lists MCP IOPS:
Figure 55: Overall MCP IOPS from 6 VMs of dual hex core, MP3 only, 16kbps
| Ports | Overall 6 VMs MCP IOPS (kbps) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 28.931 | 14.915 | 14.016 |
| 360 | 86.517 | 44.456 | 42.061 |
| 480 | 114.574 | 59.153 | 55.421 |
| 600 | 142.112 | 73.730 | 68.382 |
| 660 | 156.495 | 81.359 | 75.136 |
| 720 | 170.237 | 88.660 | 81.577 |
| 780 | 184.173 | 96.048 | 88.125 |
| 840 | 197.767 | 103.263 | 94.504 |
| 900 | 211.644 | 110.545 | 101.099 |
The graph below compares Overall MCP IOPS with MP3 32k MCP IOPS, and shows the same trend of physical server results that appeared in Figure: MCP IOPS on Single Hex Core Physical Server, MP3 16Kbps vs 32Kbps:
MP3 16KBPS Bit Rate Compression with Encryption
We tested the MP3 16 kbps bit rate with encryption, using the dest2 physical server and Vitual Machine (VM) environments, which compares with results of non-encryption from MP3 16 kbps Bit Rate without Encryption. The OS remained Windows 2008 R2 x64.
Physical Server on Single Hex Core
These tests were performed on Hardware Profile 1: a physical server on a single hex core of Dell R410. The three graphs below compare system CPU usage and audio quality-related metrics, max jitter and max delta.
In the graphs above, encryption consumes slightly higher system CPU than does non-encryption. Max Jitter and Max Delta consume much more CPU with encryption, than without. If a slightly higher delay due to latency introduced by encryption is acceptable, then recommended and preferred port capacity would be 210 ports—only a 12.5% reduction from the peak capacity of 240 ports offered by non-encryption. If the audio quality strictly applies, then the recommended port capacity can be as low as 120 ports. Peak port capacity could be the same 270 ports as non-encryption, if the delay is acceptable.
The table below lists system disk IOPS:
Figure 60: IOPS on physical server of single hex core, MP3 only, 16 Kbps, encryption
| Ports | Physical Server Disk IOPS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 60 | 14.66 | 0.036 | 14.62 |
| 120 | 24.00 | 0.041 | 23.95 |
| 180 | 33.42 | 0.029 | 33.39 |
| 210 | 37.65 | 0.030 | 37.62 |
| 240 | 42.21 | 0.029 | 42.18 |
| 270 | 47.18 | 0.036 | 47.14 |
| 300 | 51.44 | 0.011 | 51.43 |
| 330 | 55.81 | 0.006 | 55.81 |
| 360 | 60.99 | 0.002 | 60.99 |
| 390 | 67.12 | 0.003 | 67.11 |
The graph below compares system disk IOPS on a physical server IOPS with non-encryption:
System disk IOPS is nearly the same for encryption and non-encryption; both increase slightly at a higher port capacity. Some of that can be attributed by other disk IO operations, such as encryption key files.
The table below lists MCP IOPS:
Figure 62: MCP IOPS on physical server of single hex core, MP3 only, 16 Kbps, encryption
| Ports | Physical Server MCP IOPS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 60 | 16.53 | 8.88 | 7.65 |
| 120 | 32.59 | 17.69 | 14.91 |
| 150 | 40.40 | 21.96 | 18.44 |
| 180 | 48.46 | 26.46 | 22.01 |
| 210 | 56.35 | 30.83 | 25.52 |
| 240 | 64.32 | 35.24 | 29.08 |
| 270 | 72.28 | 39.64 | 32.64 |
| 300 | 80.06 | 43.95 | 36.11 |
| 330 | 88.61 | 48.53 | 40.07 |
| 360 | 100.48 | 52.91 | 47.57 |
The graph below compares total MCP IOPS between encryption and non-encryption:
MCP IOPS for encryption increases when port capacity increases. As seen in Figure: Comparison of System Disk IOPS on Single Hex Core Physical Server, MP3 16kbps encryption vs non-encryption, increase for disk IOPS is much smaller for encryption, so here the increase should be attributed to network IOs.
VMs on Dual Hex Cores Server
The testing for MP3 16kbps with encryption was conducted on the VM Profile 4 based on Hardware Profile 4 of a dual hex cores server, same as non-encryption in the 16knps tests VMs on Dual Hex Cores Server. Six VMs were configured while only one MCP was installed on each Windows VM. Below are three graphs comparing overall CPU usage, audio quality related max jitter and max delta for MP3 16kbps encryption vs non-encryption:
The VM environment exhibits a similar trend: slightly overall CPU usage for the encryption profile, and much higher for max jitter and max delta. Applying the same criteria from the physical server results, if a slightly higher delay (due to latency introduced by encryption) is acceptable, then the recommended and preferred port capacity could be 600 ports—only a 16.7% reduction of the peak 720 ports with non-encryption. If audio quality strictly applies, the recommended ports can be as low as 480 ports. And if some delay is acceptable, then the peak port capacity can be the same 840 ports as non-encryption.
The overall system disk IOPS for all 6 VMs is listed below:
Figure 67: Overall Disk IOPS on all 6 VMs of dual hex cores, MP3 only, 16 Kbps, encryption
| Ports | Overall 6 VMs Disk IOPS | SSD Drive Disk IOPS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 28.70 | 0.004 | 28.69 | 21.881 | 0.000 | 21.881 |
| 360 | 67.46 | 0.004 | 67.46 | 56.238 | 0.000 | 56.238 |
| 480 | 87.56 | 0.026 | 87.54 | 74.903 | 0.000 | 74.903 |
| 600 | 108.01 | 0.015 | 107.99 | 93.647 | 0.000 | 93.647 |
| 660 | 119.49 | 0.005 | 119.48 | 104.304 | 0.000 | 104.304 |
| 720 | 128.76 | 0.020 | 128.74 | 114.441 | 0.000 | 114.441 |
| 780 | 137.68 | 0.015 | 137.66 | 123.210 | 0.002 | 123.209 |
| 840 | 146.99 | 0.009 | 146.98 | 132.646 | 0.002 | 132.644 |
| 900 | 154.68 | 0.025 | 154.66 | 140.145 | 0.002 | 140.143 |
The graph below compares system disk IOPS with encryption and with non-encryption, on the same VM environment:
As with the physical server tests, encryption increases as port capacity increases. Also as with the physical server tests, some of that can be attributed to extra disk IO operations.
The table below lists Data throughputs for encryption:
Figure 69: Data Throughputs for MP3 only, 16 kbps, encryption
| Ports | Overall Disk KB/sec | SSD Drive Disk KB/sec | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 387.99 | 0.02 | 387.97 | 304.229 | 0.000 | 304.229 |
| 360 | 1096.82 | 22.54 | 1074.28 | 876.599 | 0.000 | 876.599 |
| 480 | 1344.60 | 107.95 | 1236.65 | 1191.403 | 0.006 | 1191.397 |
| 600 | 2187.50 | 348.40 | 1839.09 | 1532.171 | 0.000 | 1532.171 |
| 660 | 2024.16 | 35.09 | 1989.07 | 1652.232 | 0.000 | 1652.232 |
| 720 | 1955.33 | 99.81 | 1855.51 | 1803.207 | 0.006 | 1803.201 |
| 780 | 2572.79 | 205.15 | 2367.64 | 1982.733 | 0.024 | 1982.709 |
| 840 | 2534.97 | 28.65 | 2506.32 | 2097.871 | 0.043 | 2097.829 |
| 900 | 2851.85 | 119.47 | 2732.38 | 2297.264 | 0.007 | 2297.257 |
Using Formula 1...
MP3 bitrate * Ports / 8 = KB/sec
Or 16kbps * Ports / 8 =KB/sec if MP3 is 16kbps
...take two samples (120 & 720) from the above table above, and apply them to Formula 1:
16 kpbs * 120 / 8 = 240 kb close to 304 in the table (in SSD)
16 kpbs * 720 / 8 = 14400 kb close to 1803 in the table (in SSD)
The measurements from real testing for MP3 16kbps encryption are slightly higher than these calculations predict, due to other file, such as metadata and JSON files, being saved on the same cache folder.
The graph below compares overall data throughputs with no encryption:
The data throughputs for encryption increase slightly when port capacity increases, matching a similar trend with system disk IOPS.
The table below lists overall MCP IOPS from all 6 VMs:
Figure 71: Overall MCP IOPS from 6 VMs of dual hex core, MP3 only, 16kbps, encryption
| Ports | Overall 6 VMs MCP IOPS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 34.874 | 17.638 | 17.236 |
| 360 | 102.624 | 52.900 | 49.724 |
| 480 | 130.285 | 70.377 | 59.909 |
| 600 | 168.849 | 87.766 | 81.083 |
| 660 | 186.175 | 96.882 | 89.293 |
| 720 | 193.248 | 105.171 | 88.077 |
| 780 | 219.395 | 114.398 | 104.997 |
| 840 | 235.730 | 123.009 | 112.720 |
| 900 | 252.198 | 131.682 | 120.516 |
The graph below compares performance of the same configuration, except with non-encryption:
MCP IOPS performance is affected slightly by encryption, similar to the trend expressed in the physical server results.
Detailed Studies of GVP Media Server Behavior on Linux
Because MP3 16kbps produces better results than 32kbps on Windows, Linux tests focused on MP3 16kpbs testing profiles. Also based on previous results on Windows, we chose two typical Hardware Profiles for Linux testing: Hardware Profile 1 for physical server testing, and Hardware Profile 4 with Virtual Machine Profile 4 for virtual machine environment testing.
Parameter Adjustments
These adjustments achieve higher port capacity:
| Parameter | Default Value | Adjusted Value |
|---|---|---|
| mpc.recordnumparallelpost | 30 | 300 |
| mpc.recordpostretrybackoff | 120000 | 15000 |
| mpc.recordpostretrycount | 3 | 1 |
| mpc.mediamgr.recordwritetimeinterval | 1000 | 10000 |
| fm.http_proxy | (empty) | (squid bypassed) |
Comparisons with Windows
Physical Server on Single Hex Core
These tests use Software Profile 1a on Hardware Profile 1 for a physical server. Here are three graphs illustrating overall system CPU usage, MCP CPU usage and memory usage:
Linux uses more resources (CPU, memory etc) than Windows, and so lower capacity is achieved on Linux with a 37.5% reduction (150 vs. 240) for preferred ports and a 22.2% reduction (210 vs. 270) for peak ports.
The two graphs below compare audio quality in terms of max jitter and max delta:
Note that Max Jitter is somewhat close between Windows and Linux. But Linux has a lower value at lower ports and a slightly higher value on higher ports. The Max Delta shows that Linux has the higher value even though it is nearly the same for both Windows and Linux at lower ports.
System disk IOPS is illustrated in this table for Linux EL 6.5:
| Ports | Disk IOPS Physical Server | ||
| Total | Reads | Writes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 12.75 | 0.000 | 12.754 |
| 120 | 23.12 | 0.000 | 23.117 |
| 150 | 27.65 | 0.000 | 27.645 |
| 180 | 32.15 | 0.000 | 32.150 |
| 210 | 36.73 | 0.000 | 36.729 |
| 240 | 41.57 | 0.000 | 41.568 |
The graph below compares System Disk IOPS performance on Linux and Windows physical servers:
Note that IOPS on both Windows and Linux are similar; and so Disk IOPS is related to the test profile, and irrelevant to a particular OS. So the IOPS numbers from the previous Windows testing can be used generally for both Windows and Linux.
VMs on Dual Hex Cores Server
These tests use SW Profile 1a on HW Profile 1 with VM Profile 4 for virtual machine environment testing. Below are three graphs illustrating overall system CPU usage, MCP CPU usage and memory usage:
You can observe the same trend as with the physical server results in the previous section Linux consumes more CPU resources. Below are two graphs of audio quality-related metrics that show the same thing.
As observed on the above graphs, 540 ports are recommended and preferred. This is a 25% reduction compared with Windows 2008 R2 (540 vs. 720). Peak capacity would be 660 ports, which is a 21.4% reduction compared to Windows 2008 R2 (660 vs. 840). Similar reductions were also observed on physical server tests in the previous section.
The disk IOPS is displayed here:
| Ports | Overall 6 VMs Disk IOPS | SSD Drive Disk IOPS | ||||
| Total | Reads | Writes | Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 28.17 | 0.00 | 28.17 | 24.011 | 0.000 | 24.011 |
| 240 | 49.78 | 0.00 | 49.78 | 44.590 | 0.000 | 44.590 |
| 360 | 71.11 | 0.00 | 71.11 | 65.747 | 0.000 | 65.747 |
| 420 | 81.59 | 0.00 | 81.59 | 76.058 | 0.000 | 76.058 |
| 480 | 92.37 | 0.00 | 92.37 | 86.767 | 0.000 | 86.767 |
| 540 | 102.96 | 0.00 | 102.96 | 97.305 | 0.000 | 97.305 |
| 600 | 112.33 | 0.00 | 112.33 | 106.727 | 0.000 | 106.727 |
| 660 | 122.06 | 0.00 | 122.06 | 116.440 | 0.000 | 116.440 |
| 720 | 130.82 | 0.00 | 130.82 | 125.121 | 0.000 | 125.121 |
The graph below compares the above table with the corresponding table for Windows, for the same MP3-only 16 kbps profile:
Note that disk IOPS results for Linux and Windows are very close, and corresponds to the results on a physical server in the previous section.
The data throughput for this MP3-only profile on EL 6.5 is illustrated below:
| Ports | Overall Disk KB/sec | SSD Drive Disk KB/sec | ||||
| Total KB/sec | Read KB/sec | Write KB/sec | Total KB/sec | Read KB/sec | Write KB/sec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 120 | 417.70 | 0.00 | 417.70 | 389.474 | 0.000 | 389.474 |
| 240 | 788.58 | 0.00 | 788.58 | 751.418 | 0.000 | 751.418 |
| 360 | 1145.77 | 0.00 | 1145.77 | 1104.237 | 0.000 | 1104.237 |
| 420 | 1317.38 | 0.00 | 1317.38 | 1274.484 | 0.000 | 1274.484 |
| 480 | 1496.20 | 0.00 | 1496.20 | 1451.114 | 0.000 | 1451.114 |
| 540 | 1677.83 | 0.00 | 1677.83 | 1627.798 | 0.000 | 1627.798 |
| 600 | 1843.65 | 0.00 | 1843.65 | 1795.706 | 0.000 | 1795.706 |
| 660 | 2023.36 | 0.00 | 2023.36 | 1974.070 | 0.000 | 1974.070 |
| 720 | 2193.62 | 0.00 | 2193.62 | 2142.769 | 0.000 | 2142.769 |
Comparing MP3 only and MP3 + WAV
Physical Server on Single Hex Core
This test uses SW Profile 2a (MP3 16 kbps + wav without encryption) on HW Profile 1 for a physical server, compared which SW Profile 1a (MP3 only 16 kbps without encryption) is used as a baseline for comparison. Below are three graphs illustrating overall system CPU usage, MCP CPU usage and memory usage:
The comparison shows apparent higher MCP usage and overall system CPU usage for the MP3 + wav profile. However, the MCP memory usage is not significantly higher.
The audio quality metric also shows some differences, below:
Note that lower capacities would be achieved for the MP3 + WAV profile. 90 ports would be recommended and preferred, a 40% reduction (90 vs. 150) compared with the MP3-only profile, while 150 ports would be peak capacity a 28.6% reduction (150 vs. 210).
System disk IOPS is listed in the following table:
| Ports | Physical Server Disk IOPS | ||
| Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 30 | 15.18 | 0.008 | 15.17 |
| 60 | 26.70 | 0.000 | 26.70 |
| 90 | 35.53 | 0.003 | 35.53 |
| 120 | 46.04 | 0.002 | 46.04 |
| 150 | 55.44 | 0.000 | 55.44 |
| 180 | 65.50 | 1.520 | 63.98 |
The graph below compares disk IOPS with the MP3-only profile:
The MP3-only profile is almost double the disk IOPS for MP3 + wav profile, as observed in the Windows testing.
VMs on Dual Hex Cores Server
A similar trend of overall CPU usage occurs in the Virtual Machine environment.
The audio quality metrics shows similar trends as on a physical server.
480 ports are recommended and preferred for this MP3 + wav profile, an 11.1% reduction (480 vs. 540 for MP3 only); peak would be 660, a 9.1% reduction (600 vs. 660 for MP3 only).
Below is a table to illustrate overall 6 VMs disk IOPS:
| Ports | Overall 6 VMs Disk IOPS | SSD Drive Disk IOPS | ||||
| Total | Reads | Writes | Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 52.99 | 0.00 | 52.99 | 48.728 | 0.000 | 48.728 |
| 240 | 100.50 | 0.00 | 100.50 | 95.174 | 0.000 | 95.174 |
| 360 | 144.34 | 0.00 | 144.34 | 138.864 | 0.000 | 138.864 |
| 420 | 164.65 | 0.00 | 164.65 | 158.979 | 0.000 | 158.979 |
| 480 | 183.45 | 0.00 | 183.45 | 177.711 | 0.000 | 177.711 |
| 540 | 207.27 | 0.00 | 207.27 | 201.564 | 0.000 | 201.564 |
| 600 | 224.97 | 0.00 | 224.97 | 219.197 | 0.000 | 219.197 |
| 660 | 275.49 | 0.00 | 275.49 | 269.584 | 0.000 | 269.584 |
| 720 | 187.34 | 0.00 | 187.33 | 179.984 | 0.001 | 179.983 |
Compared with the MP3-only profile, overall 6 VM disk IOPS for MP3 + wav profile shows almost double IOPS, as in the previous physical server section.
The table below illustrats overall data throughput for this MP3 + wav profile on VMs of RH EL 6.5 environment.
| Ports | Overall Disk KB/sec | SSD Drive Disk KB/sec | ||||
| Total KB/sec | Read KB/sec | Write KB/sec | Total KB/sec | Read KB/sec | Write KB/sec | |
| 120 | 2376.30 | 0.00 | 2376.30 | 2347.222 | 0.000 | 2347.222 |
| 240 | 4684.79 | 0.00 | 4684.79 | 4646.371 | 0.000 | 4646.371 |
| 360 | 6975.83 | 0.00 | 6975.83 | 6933.441 | 0.000 | 6933.441 |
| 420 | 8100.79 | 0.00 | 8100.79 | 8056.843 | 0.001 | 8056.842 |
| 480 | 9242.32 | 0.00 | 9242.32 | 9195.871 | 0.001 | 9195.871 |
| 540 | 10391.78 | 0.00 | 10391.78 | 10344.249 | 0.001 | 10344.249 |
| 600 | 11512.54 | 0.00 | 11512.54 | 11462.150 | 0.001 | 11462.149 |
| 660 | 12804.19 | 0.01 | 12804.18 | 12752.305 | 0.001 | 12752.304 |
| 720 | 9380.58 | 0.00 | 9380.58 | 9336.194 | 0.003 | 9336.191 |
Encryption
MP3 16 kbps Only on a Physical Server of Single Hex Core
This is SW Profile 3a (MP3 16 kbps only with encryption) on HW Profile 1 for a physical server which SW Profile 1a (MP3 only 16 kbps without encryption) is used as baseline to compare with. Here are the three graphs illustrating overall system CPU usage, MCP CPU usage and memory usage:
It can be observed that both system CPU and MCP CPU are quite inline to each other between encryption and non-encryption profiles while MCP memory for encryption is slightly higher than non-encryption.
Let us look at audio quality metrics further:
Max Jitter is similar for both encryption and non-encryption scenarios, as are the Max Delta metrics. Thus, the preferred ports (540) and peak ports (660) for encryption are the same as for non-encryption.
System disk IOPS is illustrated below:
| Ports | Physical Server Disk IOPS | ||
| Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 30 | 8.12 | 0.000 | 8.122 |
| 60 | 14.22 | 0.000 | 14.220 |
| 90 | 19.98 | 0.000 | 19.975 |
| 120 | 25.12 | 0.000 | 25.122 |
| 150 | 30.62 | 0.000 | 30.621 |
| 180 | 35.07 | 0.000 | 35.074 |
| 210 | 39.83 | 0.000 | 39.828 |
| 240 | 44.74 | 0.000 | 44.739 |
The graph below compares encryption with non-encryption:
Slightly higher system disk IOPS occurs in the encryption scenario, likely caused by the extra key/pem files required for encryption.
MP3 16 kbps Only on VMs of Dual Hex Cores
This test uses SW Profile 3a (MP3 16 kbps only with encryption) on VM Profile 4 configured as HW Profile 0 for a VM environment, compared with SW Profile 1a (MP3 only 16 kbps without encryption) on the same hardware specification. Below are graphs illustrating overall system CPU usage and memory usage:
As observed in previous physical server graphs, CPU usage is almost the same for both encryption and non-encryption, while MCP memory usage is slightly higher for encryption.
Consider audio quality metrics:
Similar trends can be observed in the previous physical server section that both encryption and non-encryption achieved similar value for both Max Jitter and Max Delta. So the preferred ports (540) and peak ports (660) for encryption would be the same as non-encryption.
| Ports | Overall 6 VMs Disk IOPS | SSD Drive Disk IOPS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Reads | Writes | Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 30.44 | 0.00 | 30.44 | 25.997 | 0.000 | 25.997 |
| 240 | 53.41 | 0.00 | 53.41 | 47.939 | 0.000 | 47.939 |
| 360 | 75.57 | 0.00 | 75.57 | 70.011 | 0.000 | 70.011 |
| 420 | 86.37 | 0.00 | 86.37 | 80.600 | 0.000 | 80.600 |
| 480 | 97.32 | 0.00 | 97.32 | 91.564 | 0.000 | 91.564 |
| 540 | 108.20 | 0.00 | 108.20 | 102.393 | 0.000 | 102.393 |
| 600 | 117.95 | 0.00 | 117.95 | 112.132 | 0.000 | 112.132 |
| 660 | 127.85 | 0.00 | 127.85 | 121.911 | 0.000 | 121.911 |
| 720 | 136.85 | 0.00 | 136.85 | 130.951 | 0.000 | 130.951 |
The graph below compares encryption with non-encryption:
As in the previous physical server section, system disk IOPS for encryption is slightly higher than non-encryption.
Data throughput is illustrated in this table:
| Ports | Overall Disk KB/sec | SSD Drive Disk KB/sec | ||||
| Total KB/sec | Read KB/sec | Write KB/sec | Total KB/sec | Read KB/sec | Write KB/sec | |
| 120 | 435.55 | 0.00 | 435.55 | 403.192 | 0.000 | 403.192 |
| 240 | 822.06 | 0.00 | 822.06 | 780.379 | 0.000 | 780.379 |
| 360 | 1186.43 | 0.00 | 1186.43 | 1140.874 | 0.000 | 1140.874 |
| 420 | 1359.14 | 0.00 | 1359.14 | 1311.668 | 0.000 | 1311.668 |
| 480 | 1549.49 | 0.00 | 1549.49 | 1500.982 | 0.000 | 1500.982 |
| 540 | 1719.89 | 0.00 | 1719.89 | 1669.506 | 0.000 | 1669.506 |
| 600 | 1905.09 | 0.00 | 1905.09 | 1853.208 | 0.000 | 1853.208 |
| 660 | 2081.23 | 0.00 | 2081.23 | 2027.495 | 0.000 | 2027.495 |
| 720 | 2269.56 | 0.00 | 2269.56 | 2214.658 | 0.000 | 2214.658 |
MP3 16 kbps + wav on VMs of Dual Hex Cores
This test uses SW Profile 4a (MP3 16 kbps + wav with encryption) on VM Profile 4 configured as HW Profile 1 for a VM environment to compare with SW Profile 2a (MP3 16 kbps + wav without encryption) on the same HW spec. Below are two graphs illustrating overall system CPU usage and memory usage:
System CPU usage is quite close to each other for both encryption and non-encryption, while MCP memory usage for encryption is slightly higher than for non-encryption, similar to the previous MP3 only test scenarios.
The audio quality metrics of Max Jitter and Max Delta also show similar trends.
The recommended and preferred ports for encryption of MP3 + wav would be 480 the same as non-encryption of MP3 + wav, as is 600 for peak ports.
The table below shows overall system disk IOPS, for reference:
| Ports | Overall 6 VMs Disk IOPS | SSD Drive Disk IOPS | ||||
| Total | Reads | Writes | Total | Reads | Writes | |
| 120 | 53.97 | 0.00 | 53.97 | 49.506 | 0.000 | 49.506 |
| 240 | 102.98 | 0.00 | 102.98 | 97.468 | 0.000 | 97.468 |
| 360 | 149.87 | 0.00 | 149.87 | 144.235 | 0.000 | 144.235 |
| 420 | 171.89 | 0.00 | 171.89 | 166.144 | 0.000 | 166.144 |
| 480 | 196.97 | 0.00 | 196.97 | 191.140 | 0.000 | 191.140 |
| 540 | 223.52 | 0.01 | 223.51 | 217.663 | 0.000 | 217.663 |
| 600 | 246.26 | 0.03 | 246.22 | 240.216 | 0.000 | 240.216 |
| 660 | 296.60 | 0.00 | 296.60 | 290.582 | 0.000 | 290.582 |
The graph below compares encryption with non-encryption, and shows the same trend as observed previously in this section:
Data throughput is also listed below as reference:
| Ports | Overall Disk KB/sec | SSD Drive Disk KB/sec | ||||
| Total KB/sec | Read KB/sec | Write KB/sec | Total KB/sec | Read KB/sec | Write KB/sec | |
| 120 | 2421.76 | 0.00 | 2421.76 | 2373.612 | 0.000 | 2373.612 |
| 240 | 4756.37 | 0.00 | 4756.37 | 4699.737 | 0.000 | 4699.737 |
| 360 | 7065.62 | 0.00 | 7065.62 | 7004.491 | 0.000 | 7004.491 |
| 420 | 8179.23 | 0.00 | 8179.23 | 8116.591 | 0.000 | 8116.591 |
| 480 | 9366.53 | 0.00 | 9366.53 | 9301.426 | 0.000 | 9301.426 |
| 540 | 10489.26 | 0.14 | 10489.12 | 10423.230 | 0.000 | 10423.230 |
| 600 | 11647.29 | 0.78 | 11646.51 | 11574.973 | 0.000 | 11574.973 |
| 660 | 12976.30 | 0.06 | 12976.24 | 12905.764 | 0.001 | 12905.763 |